⌘K
Federal filingsHome›Recalls›Investigations› EA24002
NHTSA defect investigation · Engineering Analysis

Honda engineering analysis EA24002

Inadvertent Automatic Emergency Braking. NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened this engineering analysis about the automatic emergency braking on 11 model years (2017–2022). Opened Apr 15, 2024 and still open — 2.6 years so far, against NHTSA’s goal of eighteen months for a engineering analysis. open

What NHTSA says

Source: Office of Defects Investigation, as filed

On February 21, 2022, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Preliminary Evaluation (PE22003) to assess reports of inadvertent activation of the Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS), an automatic emergency braking (AEB) system, in model year 2017-2019 Honda CR-V and 2018-2019 Honda Accord vehicles.  The reports allege that activation of the AEB system occurs while driving with no apparent obstruction in the vehicle's forward path, resulting in sudden vehicle deceleration. Honda indicated that they were aware of a total of X,XXX reports that may relate to the alleged defect. Honda provided analysis of the alleged defect and alleges that some customers possibly had an inadequate understanding of the CMBS and its limitations.  However, many consumer complaints allege that Honda dealerships were unable to reproduce the condition or state that they were informed that this is considered normal CMBS operation. To date, ODI has received a total of 1,294 consumer complaints of inadvertent activation of CMBS in 2017-2022 Honda CR-V and 2018-2022 Honda Accord vehicles. A total of 31 complaints alleged a crash and 50 alleged an injury.  The Total column in the Failure Report Summary removes duplicate reports and shows the total number of reports with unique VINs from all Manufacturer, ODI, and EWR data sources.  In some cases, there were multiple reports associated with a particular vehicle in which recurring failures were alleged.  In total, there were X,XXX reports, 93 injury incidents and 47 crashes involving vehicles with unique VINs that may relate to the alleged defect. PE22-003 has been upgraded to an Engineering Analysis to further assess the scope, frequency, and potential safety related consequences of the inadvertent AEB activations. The scope has been expanded to include assessment of model year 2020-2022 Honda CR-V and Accord vehicles. To review the ODI reports cited in the Opening Resume ODI Report Identification Number document, go to NHTSA.gov.

Stage Engineering Analysis — NHTSA works to complete one within eighteen months Opened Apr 15, 2024 Closed still open Manufacturer Honda (American Honda Motor Co.) Components Forward Collision Avoidance › Automatic Emergency Braking, Forward Collision Avoidance, Forward Collision Avoidance › Sensing System › Camera, Forward Collision Avoidance › Sensing System › Radar, Forward Collision Avoidance › Software

A Engineering Analysis is the deeper stage, usually upgraded from a Preliminary Evaluation: NHTSA tests, requests engineering documents and decides whether a safety defect exists. The summary is the agency’s own text from its investigation file, unedited; the resumes carrying the full reasoning are linked below.

The paperwork NHTSA filed

Source: every document on this action, at nhtsa.gov
DocumentCodeFiledAt NHTSA
Opening resumeINOA2024PDF
Information request to the manufacturerINIM2024PDF
Manufacturer's response — dataINRD202438 files 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738

40 of 130 documents shown; the rest are under this number at nhtsa.gov.

These are NHTSA’s own files, served from the agency’s site — the resumes are what ODI wrote when it opened and closed the action, and the rest is the correspondence behind them, including what the manufacturer sent when the agency asked. They are linked, not copied: where a document names the people who wrote in, that redaction is the agency’s to make and its copy is the one you should read.

What owners had already reported

Source: complaints on file the day it opened

When NHTSA opened this on Apr 15, 2024, owners had filed 8,368 complaints with the agency about the model years above, of which 1,534 named the forward collision avoidance NHTSA went on to investigate. Owner complaints are the agency’s main early signal, and more can be filed while an action is open.

This is what the complaint file held on that date, not a claim about which reports prompted the investigation — NHTSA’s complaint records carry no investigation number, so nobody can make that link from the data alone. The opening resume linked above names the reports ODI itself cited. Complaint records on this site begin with 2016.

What this means for an owner

Source: and what happens next

An investigation is not a finding that a defect exists, and it puts no duty on anyone. NHTSA opens a Preliminary Evaluation when complaints and other reports suggest a condition worth asking the manufacturer about; it upgrades to an Engineering Analysis when the answers warrant testing; it closes either when it recommends a recall, when the manufacturer recalls on its own, or when no defect trend is found. The agency’s own goals are about four months for a petition, eight for a Preliminary Evaluation or a Recall Query and eighteen for an Engineering Analysis; many run longer.

This one is open. Nothing is owed on the vehicle today; if it becomes a recall, owners are written to and the repair is free. The moment to know is the day the campaign number appears — Recall Watch checks each VIN against every new NHTSA campaign and emails you when one lands, or take a free one-line alert by model year.

Model years it names

Source: as NHTSA filed them

A vehicle page’s investigation list carries the same action; a name here is the scope NHTSA opened, not a list of affected VINs.

An investigation is not a recall. Yet.

If NHTSA’s questions become a recall, the campaign lands in the federal file first. Recall Watch checks your VINs against every new campaign the night it is filed.

Photo: Dmitrii Filatov / Unsplash

Common questions

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation

Is EA24002 a recall?

No. A engineering analysis is NHTSA asking questions, not a recall. A safety recall carries an NHTSA campaign number and a duty to repair for free; this one has not produced one. Whether one particular vehicle has an open recall is a VIN question at nhtsa.gov/recalls.

Is EA24002 still open?

Yes, as of NHTSA’s latest file: opened Apr 15, 2024, 2.6 years ago.

Which vehicles does EA24002 cover?

NHTSA opened it on 11 model years: 2022 Honda Accord, 2021 Honda Accord, 2020 Honda Accord, 2019 Honda Accord, 2018 Honda Accord, 2022 Honda CR-V and more. That is the scope of the inquiry, not a list of affected vehicles; a recall, if one follows, defines its own population by VIN.