Ducati preliminary evaluation PE21003
Extended Stopping Distance. NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened this preliminary evaluation about the service brakes on 94 model years (2012–2021). Opened Feb 18, 2021, closed Jul 9, 2021 after 5 months. It led to safety recall 21V315000. became a recall
What NHTSA says
Source: Office of Defects Investigation, as filedThe Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this Preliminary Evaluation (PE) based on twenty-two (22) Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQs) for soft rear brakes caused by air seeping into the rear brake lines of model year (MY) 2012-2020 Ducati Monster, Multistrada, SuperSport, Panigale, Scrambler and Diavel motorcycles. The consumers were alleging that the rear brakes would not properly function unless the rear brake pedal was applied several times or that there was a total loss of rear braking during normal applications, increasing the risk of a crash. In a March 2020 meeting, Ducati indicated that they were aware of certain models in which air may enter the motorcycles' rear braking system through the brake lines, due to exposure to heat from the exhaust system. Although this condition compromises rear braking performance, Ducati stated that they did not consider this to be a safety defect because the front and rear brake systems are hydraulically independent from each other, and a motorcycle's front brake system performs most of the stopping. Additionally, they believed that routine brake fluid replacement would resolve consumers' concerns, however complainants and dealership service technicians reported that, in some cases, after a dealer serviced the rear brake system, the rear brake pedal would feel soft and spongy again (indicating compromised brake performance) less than a year later--well before the recommended two-year brake fluid service interval. As a precaution, Ducati issued a series of technical service bulletins (TSBs) to replace the brake lines with redesigned ones, rerouting them away from the exhaust system. ODI's position is that all of the brakes on a motorcycle are considered necessary for safety. Analysis of the data identified that neither the entire model line nor the entire model year range of motorcycles covered by the investigation were affected, but rather certain sub-models or narrower model year ranges of motorcycles incorporated brake lines with a higher exposure to the heat from the exhaust system. Because of the unique routing of each model's brake line, some motorcycles are more susceptible to the condition than others. As these specific models and model years were most likely to exhibit an increased risk of a crash from the lengthened stopping distance, Ducati converted the previously issued TSBs into a safety recall. After receiving a total of 94 VOQs, ODI is closing this PE with Ducati's safety recall 21V-315. With the recall action taken by Ducati, this investigation is closed. However, the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist on other models or MY vehicles outside of the recall scope. The agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.
A Preliminary Evaluation is the first formal stage: NHTSA has decided the complaints and other information it screened are worth a closer look, and asks the manufacturer for its own data on the condition. The summary is the agency’s own text from its investigation file, unedited; the resumes carrying the full reasoning are linked below.
The paperwork NHTSA filed
Source: every document on this action, at nhtsa.gov- Opening resume — ODI’s own summary of why it opened this — the subject, what prompted it, and the vehicles in scope.
- Closing resume — ODI’s own summary of why it closed this, and what it concluded.
| Document | Code | Filed | At NHTSA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening resume | INOA | 2021 | |
| Closing resume | INCLA | 2021 | |
| Information request to the manufacturer | INIM | 2021 |
These are NHTSA’s own files, served from the agency’s site — the resumes are what ODI wrote when it opened and closed the action, and the rest is the correspondence behind them, including what the manufacturer sent when the agency asked. They are linked, not copied: where a document names the people who wrote in, that redaction is the agency’s to make and its copy is the one you should read.
What owners had already reported
Source: complaints on file the day it openedWhen NHTSA opened this on Feb 18, 2021, owners had filed 38 complaints with the agency about the model years above, of which 17 named the service brakes NHTSA went on to investigate. Owner complaints are the agency’s main early signal: ODI screens them, and a Preliminary Evaluation is usually where a pattern in them ends up.
This is what the complaint file held on that date, not a claim about which reports prompted the investigation — NHTSA’s complaint records carry no investigation number, so nobody can make that link from the data alone. The opening resume linked above names the reports ODI itself cited. Complaint records on this site begin with 2016.
What this means for an owner
Source: and what happens nextAn investigation is not a finding that a defect exists, and it puts no duty on anyone. NHTSA opens a Preliminary Evaluation when complaints and other reports suggest a condition worth asking the manufacturer about; it upgrades to an Engineering Analysis when the answers warrant testing; it closes either when it recommends a recall, when the manufacturer recalls on its own, or when no defect trend is found. The agency’s own goals are about four months for a petition, eight for a Preliminary Evaluation or a Recall Query and eighteen for an Engineering Analysis; many run longer.
This one became a recall. The campaign page carries the manufacturer’s filed defect, risk and remedy, the build window and every model year covered; whether one specific vehicle is included is settled by VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
Model years it names
Source: as NHTSA filed themAlso named: 2012 Ducati Diavel; 2013 Ducati Diavel; 2014 Ducati Diavel; 2015 Ducati Diavel; 2016 Ducati Diavel; 2017 Ducati Diavel; 2018 Ducati Diavel; 2019 Ducati Diavel; 2020 Ducati Diavel; 2013 Ducati Monster; 2015 Ducati Monster; 2012 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO; 2014 Ducati Monster 1200; 2015 Ducati Monster 1200; 2016 Ducati Monster 1200; 2017 Ducati Monster 1200; 2018 Ducati Monster 1200; 2019 Ducati Monster 1200; 2020 Ducati Monster 1200; 2021 Ducati Monster 1200; 2012 Ducati Monster 696; 2012 Ducati Monster 796; 2017 Ducati Monster 797; 2018 Ducati Monster 797; 2019 Ducati Monster 797; 2020 Ducati Monster 797; 2016 Ducati Monster 821; 2017 Ducati Monster 821; 2018 Ducati Monster 821; 2019 Ducati Monster 821; 2020 Ducati Monster 821; 2012 Ducati Multistrada; 2013 Ducati Multistrada; 2014 Ducati Multistrada; 2015 Ducati Multistrada; 2016 Ducati Multistrada; 2017 Ducati Multistrada; 2018 Ducati Multistrada; 2019 Ducati Multistrada; 2020 Ducati Multistrada; 2012 Ducati Multistrada 1200; 2013 Ducati Multistrada 1200; 2014 Ducati Multistrada 1200; 2015 Ducati Multistrada 1200; 2016 Ducati Multistrada 1200; 2017 Ducati Multistrada 1200; 2012 Ducati Multistrada 1200 ABS; 2013 Ducati Multistrada 1200 ABS; 2015 Ducati Multistrada 1200S; 2016 Ducati Multistrada 1200S; 2018 Ducati Multistrada 1260; 2019 Ducati Multistrada 1260 Enduro; 2015 Ducati Panigale; 2016 Ducati Panigale; 2017 Ducati Panigale; 2018 Ducati Panigale; 2019 Ducati Panigale; 2020 Ducati Panigale; 2018 Ducati Panigale 1299 FE; 2018 Ducati Panigale 959 and 34 more.
A vehicle page’s investigation list carries the same action; a name here is the scope NHTSA opened, not a list of affected VINs.
Common questions
Source: NHTSA Office of Defects InvestigationIs PE21003 a recall?
No — it is the investigation that led to one. Recall 21V315000 is the campaign; its page carries the remedy.
Is PE21003 still open?
No. It closed on Jul 9, 2021 and led to recall 21V315000.
Which vehicles does PE21003 cover?
NHTSA opened it on 94 model years: 2012 Ducati Diavel, 2013 Ducati Diavel, 2014 Ducati Diavel, 2015 Ducati Diavel, 2016 Ducati Diavel, 2017 Ducati Diavel and more. That is the scope of the inquiry, not a list of affected vehicles; a recall, if one follows, defines its own population by VIN.