Bendix preliminary evaluation PE13012
Single Wheel End Thermal Overload. NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened this preliminary evaluation about the disc. Opened Apr 26, 2013, closed Dec 2, 2013 after 7 months without a recall. closed
What NHTSA says
Source: Office of Defects Investigation, as filedTo date, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) is aware of 45 complaints and field reports related to single wheel end thermal overload events on certain model year 2012 through 2013 trucks equipped with Bendix air disc brakes. Of the 45 complaints, 15 allege the thermal overload condition resulted in a fire. However, because the severity is low in all reported incidents, it is difficult to accurately quantify the number of fire incidents as opposed to those incidents where a fire related phenomenon was observed (such as smoke, which may sometimes be confused with the normal off-gassing of brake pad binder resins) or where brake system components simply suffered heat damage due to the thermal overload condition. In all reported incidents, heat related damage was apparently contained to the wheel end itself. Heat affected components typically included the brake caliper, pads, rotor, hub cap, anti-lock braking system (ABS) sensor wire and wheel torque indicators. In only three incidents did someone apply a fire extinguishing agent to address the concern and in all three cases it was a portable handheld fire extinguisher that was discharged. All other reported fire incidents were apparently self-extinguishing. In the most severe fire incident, the adjacent tire did not catch fire, the brake caliper did not have an orange or red color as is typical when a thermal overload event occurs, the black caliper paint sustained some heat damage, the caliper tappet boots had the typical appearance and did not appear heat damaged and the affected rotor/hub would turn freely once cooled. None of the 15 incidents could be inspected or verified by ODI as having been fires. Typically, brake system components subject to thermal overloading were repaired prior to the opening of this investigation and affected components had been discarded. As a result, scant forensic evidence has been available for inspection and review by ODI or Bendix. ODI is not aware of any allegations of extended stopping distances in the subject vehicles due to the alleged defect. There have been no reports of crash or loss of vehicle control related to the alleged defect. There have been no reports of property damage beyond the subject vehicle and all affected vehicles have been repaired and returned to service. There have been no reports of injury or death. Finally, ODI has not identified any apparent trend with respect to root cause. A safety-related defect has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted. Accordingly, this investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances.
A Preliminary Evaluation is the first formal stage: NHTSA has decided the complaints and other information it screened are worth a closer look, and asks the manufacturer for its own data on the condition. The summary is the agency’s own text from its investigation file, unedited; the opening and closing resumes with the full reasoning are on NHTSA’s site under this number.
What this means for an owner
Source: and what happens nextAn investigation is not a finding that a defect exists, and it puts no duty on anyone. NHTSA opens a Preliminary Evaluation when complaints and other reports suggest a condition worth asking the manufacturer about; it upgrades to an Engineering Analysis when the answers warrant testing; it closes either when it recommends a recall, when the manufacturer recalls on its own, or when no defect trend is found. The agency’s own goals are about four months for a petition, eight for a Preliminary Evaluation or a Recall Query and eighteen for an Engineering Analysis; many run longer.
This one closed without a recall. That means NHTSA found no defect trend it chose to act on at the time, or the manufacturer addressed the condition another way (a service campaign or a bulletin, which have their own pages). A closed file can be reopened if new reports arrive.
Model years it names
Source: as NHTSA filed themNHTSA filed this action against BENDIX SPICER FOUNDATION BRAKE LLC without naming a model year — an equipment or manufacturer-level query.
Common questions
Source: NHTSA Office of Defects InvestigationIs PE13012 a recall?
No. A preliminary evaluation is NHTSA asking questions, not a recall. A safety recall carries an NHTSA campaign number and a duty to repair for free; this one closed without one. Whether one particular vehicle has an open recall is a VIN question at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
Is PE13012 still open?
No. It closed on Dec 2, 2013 without a recall.
Which vehicles does PE13012 cover?
NHTSA filed it against BENDIX SPICER FOUNDATION BRAKE LLC without naming a model year.