Mercedes-Benz preliminary evaluation PE10050
Brake lamp switch failure.. NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened this preliminary evaluation about the switch on 11 model years (2000–2002). Opened Dec 21, 2010, closed May 4, 2011 after 4 months. It led to safety recall 11V208000. became a recall
What NHTSA says
Source: Office of Defects Investigation, as filedODI opened the investigation based on reports that the subject vehicle brake lamp switch (switch) failure caused 1) inoperative brake lamps (stay on or fail to illuminate), and/or 2) shift interlock failure (shifter locked in park), and/or 3) the cruise control to fail to cancel with brake application. Consumers also reported the illumination of a warning lamp on the instrument panel. The switch contains three sets of electrical contacts and a (normally extended) spring loaded plunger that actuates the contacts as it moves. As installed in the vehicle, the plunger contacts the brake pedal arm and is pushed into the switch; as the driver applies the pedal the plunger extends. One set of contacts (BLS) operates the stop lamps, a second set (EWM) controls the shift interlock system, and a third set (BS) is used by an on-board diagnostic (OBD) system to monitor switch operation. The cruise control monitors the BLS signal to determine when the brake is applied, the primary way the system is disabled when set. The relative timing of contact actuation in response to plunger movement allows the OBD system to detect a switch fault. When a fault is detected a malfunction indication lamp (MIL) is illuminated (driver alert), a diagnostic trouble code (DTC) is stored (for the service technician), and cruise control operation is inhibited (as a failsafe).In its response to ODI's January 2011 information request letter, MB explained its assessment of switch failures which was based primarily on evaluation of field return failures. MB identified both 1) electrical contact and 2) mechanical switch failure mechanisms. According to MB's analysis, electrical contact failure is the predominate failure type and the failure consequence depends on which contact fails. For instance MB claims that BLS contact failures are momentary in nature and do not affect brake light operation but are nonetheless detected by the OBD system, resulting in a DTC and subsequent replacement. Electrical contact failures of the BS and EWM contacts result in a DTC also, and EWM contact failures result in the shifter being stuck in the park (which can be overridden by the consumer).Accordingly MB maintains that electrical contact failures of the switch have no safety consequence since the brake lamps remain operational and the cruise control is always disabled. MB determined that mechanical failures of the switch, which are rare in their assessment, can result from internal wear and/or increased switch operating temperatures. High temperatures occur due to overheating of the BLS contacts and can cause the internal plastic components to melt. In one scenario overheated BLS contacts may melt to the extended plunger and are damaged when the brake pedal is released resulting in the brake lights staying on. In another scenario the increased temperatures and/or internal wear can cause the plunger to stick in the fully depressed position. In this case the cruise may not cancel when the brake is applied and the driver may have to use high brake pedal forces or other means (shifting to neutral or using the cruise master switch) to disengage the cruise. Additionally the vacuum assist can be depleted if the driver pumps the brakes resulting in reduced braking effectiveness and even higher pedal forces. In its March 31, 2011 defect notification, MB stated that to remediate the potential need for excessive brake force it would conduct a safety recall (11V-208) to replace the switch with a more robustly designed component. The recall includes 136,751 model year 2000 - 2002 M-Class and model year 2000 - 2004 M-Class AMG vehicles. Owner notification letters will be mailed
A Preliminary Evaluation is the first formal stage: NHTSA has decided the complaints and other information it screened are worth a closer look, and asks the manufacturer for its own data on the condition. The summary is the agency’s own text from its investigation file, unedited; the opening and closing resumes with the full reasoning are on NHTSA’s site under this number.
What this means for an owner
Source: and what happens nextAn investigation is not a finding that a defect exists, and it puts no duty on anyone. NHTSA opens a Preliminary Evaluation when complaints and other reports suggest a condition worth asking the manufacturer about; it upgrades to an Engineering Analysis when the answers warrant testing; it closes either when it recommends a recall, when the manufacturer recalls on its own, or when no defect trend is found. The agency’s own goals are about four months for a petition, eight for a Preliminary Evaluation or a Recall Query and eighteen for an Engineering Analysis; many run longer.
This one became a recall. The campaign page carries the manufacturer’s filed defect, risk and remedy, the build window and every model year covered; whether one specific vehicle is included is settled by VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
Model years it names
Source: as NHTSA filed themAlso named: 2000 Mercedes-Benz M Class; 2001 Mercedes-Benz M Class; 2002 Mercedes-Benz M Class; 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML320; 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML320; 2002 Mercedes-Benz ML320; 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML430; 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML430; 2002 Mercedes-Benz ML500; 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML55; 2002 Mercedes-Benz ML55.
A vehicle page’s investigation list carries the same action; a name here is the scope NHTSA opened, not a list of affected VINs.
Common questions
Source: NHTSA Office of Defects InvestigationIs PE10050 a recall?
No — it is the investigation that led to one. Recall 11V208000 is the campaign; its page carries the remedy.
Is PE10050 still open?
No. It closed on May 4, 2011 and led to recall 11V208000.
Which vehicles does PE10050 cover?
NHTSA opened it on 11 model years: 2000 Mercedes-Benz M Class, 2001 Mercedes-Benz M Class, 2002 Mercedes-Benz M Class, 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML320, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML320, 2002 Mercedes-Benz ML320 and more. That is the scope of the inquiry, not a list of affected vehicles; a recall, if one follows, defines its own population by VIN.