⌘K
HomeRecallsInvestigations EQ17001
NHTSA defect investigation · Equipment Query

Continental equipment query EQ17001

Fuel Filter Flange May Crack. NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened this equipment query about the delivery. Opened Jul 6, 2017, closed Feb 8, 2018 after 7 months without a recall. closed

What NHTSA says

Source: Office of Defects Investigation, as filed

Over the span of a number of months in later 2016 and mid-2017, automakers Volkswagen, Audi and Porsche filed four safety recall notifications and information reports (16V-660, 17V-151, 17-V289 and 17V-298) concerning fuel leaks in certain VW, Audi, and Porsche vehicle products. According to these manufacturers, the vehicles were equipped with fuel pump flanges that could over time develop small cracks or fissures allowing fuel to leak in vaporous or liquid state. The leaks could, in the presence of an ignition source, have the potential to cause a vehicle fire. In June 2017, at the request of the Recall Management Division (RMD), the supplier of the fuel flanges, Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. (Continental), filed its safety recall notification and information report (17E-031).Continental limited its defect decision to the fuel flanges supplied to VW, Audi and Porsche products under the existing recalls, but as required by regulation identified other automaker purchasers that used potentially similar fuel flanges manufactured from the same material, an industry standard material known as Polyoxymethylen-Copolymer (POM).Continental acknowledged that a root cause for the leaks have not been determined, but it believed environmental factors such as acids from cleaning solutions or other sources, were a factor, an observation also identified by VW, Audi and Porsche. Continental also identified that there were specific differences in design and application between vehicle manufacturers, and the installed location of the fuel flange were considered other pertinent factors. RMD opened this Equipment Query (EQ) investigation in order to obtain additional information to identify whether other automaker products might be at risk of fuel leakage and, if so to pursue additional safety recalls where needed. Accordingly, an information request (IR) was issued to Continental in September 2017, for it to provide additional data and information to explain the distinctions between the recalled fuel flanges and the not recalled population. On September 26, 2017, Continental submitted a partial response to the IR. It then provided updates on October 9, 2017, and October 18, 2017, to complete its response. In the meantime, Continental continued its review of the scoping of its defect decision and report. Continental's additional evaluation eventually resulted in an amended recall report in which the company stated it had confirmed the scoping identified by VW, Audi and Porsche was correct given the lack of field incidents with any non-recalled fuel flanges, and due to the differences in design and application between the recalled products and the non-recalled ones. This amendment was submitted in December 2017. RMD, with the support of several of the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) investigating offices, reviewed Continental's IR responses and the data and testing results appended to them. The information at this juncture indicates Continental's scoping of its recall decision is appropriate and expenditure of further resources to pursue additional safety recalls from other automakers is not warranted. Accordingly, this equipment query investigation is closed.

Stage Equipment Query Opened Jul 6, 2017 Closed Feb 8, 2018 Manufacturer Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. Components Fuel System, Gasoline › Delivery

A Equipment Query is a query about a piece of equipment — a component, a tire, a child seat — rather than a whole vehicle. The summary is the agency’s own text from its investigation file, unedited; the opening and closing resumes with the full reasoning are on NHTSA’s site under this number.

What this means for an owner

Source: and what happens next

An investigation is not a finding that a defect exists, and it puts no duty on anyone. NHTSA opens a Preliminary Evaluation when complaints and other reports suggest a condition worth asking the manufacturer about; it upgrades to an Engineering Analysis when the answers warrant testing; it closes either when it recommends a recall, when the manufacturer recalls on its own, or when no defect trend is found. The agency’s own goals are about four months for a petition, eight for a Preliminary Evaluation or a Recall Query and eighteen for an Engineering Analysis; many run longer.

This one closed without a recall. That means NHTSA found no defect trend it chose to act on at the time, or the manufacturer addressed the condition another way (a service campaign or a bulletin, which have their own pages). A closed file can be reopened if new reports arrive.

Model years it names

Source: as NHTSA filed them

NHTSA filed this action against Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. without naming a model year — an equipment or manufacturer-level query.

Common questions

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation

Is EQ17001 a recall?

No. A equipment query is NHTSA asking questions, not a recall. A safety recall carries an NHTSA campaign number and a duty to repair for free; this one closed without one. Whether one particular vehicle has an open recall is a VIN question at nhtsa.gov/recalls.

Is EQ17001 still open?

No. It closed on Feb 8, 2018 without a recall.

Which vehicles does EQ17001 cover?

NHTSA filed it against Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. without naming a model year.