Dimplex equipment query EQ10006
Dimplex Fireplace Remote Control Kits. NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened this equipment query about the recreational vehicle/trailer. Opened Jun 22, 2010, closed Mar 28, 2011 after 9 months. It led to safety recall 10E027000, 10V406000, 10V415000, 10V417000, 10V419000, 10V420000, 10V422000, 10V424000, 10V428000, 10V434000, 10V437000, 10V443000, 10V454000, 10V455000, 10V456000, 10V484000, 10V505000, 10V520000, 10V521000, 10V557000, 10V559000, 10V615000, 10V653000, 11V066000. became a recall
What NHTSA says
Source: Office of Defects Investigation, as filedOn May 11, 2010, Skyline Corporation notified the NHTSA that it had decided certain model year 2004-2007 Skyline Park Model trailers contain a safety related defect. Skyline stated that certain trailers were originally equipped with Dimplex electric fireplaces containing a plug-in remote control receiver that can overheat, possibly causing a fire. NHTSA assigned recall number 10V-201 to this matter. In early May 2010, Thor Industries contacted the Recall Management Division (RMD) regarding the use of these Dimplex fireplaces in several of its recreational vehicles. Upon initial contact with Dimplex, it was learned that these fireplaces were sold through a distributor that may sell them to many other recreational vehicle manufacturers to be installed as original equipment. Dimplexissued a recall with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (#10-167) for 700,000 units. In May 2010 RMD informed Dimplex of its responsibilities under 49 CFR 573 as to its obligations to conduct a safety recall for the original equipment used in motor vehicles by more than one vehicle manufacturer. Dimplex submitted its Part 573 Report (10E-027) on June 6, 2010, identifying a total 25,000 defective units sold to its distributor, WESCO International, Inc. (WESCO).On July 6, 2010, RMD mailed WESCO an Information Request (IR) letter requesting a full list of customers that were sold these recalled fireplaces. WESCO responded on July 23, 2010, with a listing of 162 companies that were further sold this equipment. After parsing out closed companies from the list and those known to RMD not to further distribute motor vehicle equipment or manufacture vehicles, RMD contacted a total of 40 companies with IR letters mailed on August 31, 2010. On November 1, 2010, RMD mailed a second round of IR letters to 14 companies that had not yet responded to the first letter. By the end of December 2010, another 2 IR letters were mailed to Wray Brothers and Rexhall Industries, as they had still not responded to RMD's letters. As of the closing of this EQ, despite multiple phone calls, e-mail exchanges, and IR letters, these two companies have still not filed an official response with RMD regarding this matter. RMD will refer this matter to the Office of the Chief Counsel (NCC) for further enforcement activity as appropriate. Of the remaining 38 companies RMD contacted, their responses break down as follows:- 23 vehicle manufacturers filed a Part 573 Report with NHTSA and contacted their affected customers.- 6 letters were returned as those companies are no longer operating.- 4 companies only used the units for samples/prototypes and did not retail them to the public.- 3 companies either did not receive any affected units or only sold their units outside the U.S.market.- 1 company, R-Vision, responded that their company filed bankruptcy and they no longer possessedcustomer records for those vehicles affected by the Dimplex equipment.- 1 company, Custom Campers, is owned by NuWa Industries and their affected units were included in NuWa's Part 573 report to NHTSA. For detailed responses, please see the attached spreadsheet outlining each company's response to NHTSA's IR letters. This EQ is closed.
A Equipment Query is a query about a piece of equipment — a component, a tire, a child seat — rather than a whole vehicle. The summary is the agency’s own text from its investigation file, unedited; the opening and closing resumes with the full reasoning are on NHTSA’s site under this number.
What this means for an owner
Source: and what happens nextAn investigation is not a finding that a defect exists, and it puts no duty on anyone. NHTSA opens a Preliminary Evaluation when complaints and other reports suggest a condition worth asking the manufacturer about; it upgrades to an Engineering Analysis when the answers warrant testing; it closes either when it recommends a recall, when the manufacturer recalls on its own, or when no defect trend is found. The agency’s own goals are about four months for a petition, eight for a Preliminary Evaluation or a Recall Query and eighteen for an Engineering Analysis; many run longer.
This one became a recall. The campaign page carries the manufacturer’s filed defect, risk and remedy, the build window and every model year covered; whether one specific vehicle is included is settled by VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
Model years it names
Source: as NHTSA filed themNHTSA filed this action against DIMPLEX NORTH AMERICA LTD. without naming a model year — an equipment or manufacturer-level query.
Common questions
Source: NHTSA Office of Defects InvestigationIs EQ10006 a recall?
No — it is the investigation that led to one. Recall 10E027000, 10V406000, 10V415000, 10V417000, 10V419000, 10V420000, 10V422000, 10V424000, 10V428000, 10V434000, 10V437000, 10V443000, 10V454000, 10V455000, 10V456000, 10V484000, 10V505000, 10V520000, 10V521000, 10V557000, 10V559000, 10V615000, 10V653000, 11V066000 is the campaign; its page carries the remedy.
Is EQ10006 still open?
No. It closed on Mar 28, 2011 and led to recall 10E027000, 10V406000, 10V415000, 10V417000, 10V419000, 10V420000, 10V422000, 10V424000, 10V428000, 10V434000, 10V437000, 10V443000, 10V454000, 10V455000, 10V456000, 10V484000, 10V505000, 10V520000, 10V521000, 10V557000, 10V559000, 10V615000, 10V653000, 11V066000.
Which vehicles does EQ10006 cover?
NHTSA filed it against DIMPLEX NORTH AMERICA LTD. without naming a model year.