DJG, Safety 1ST and 1 others engineering analysis EA10005
Harness slippage. NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation opened this engineering analysis about the strap/webbing on 177 model years (2008–2014). Opened Jul 2, 2010, closed Jun 25, 2012 after 2.0 years. It led to safety recall 11C001000. became a recall
What NHTSA says
Source: Office of Defects Investigation, as filedThe Dorel Juvenile Group (DJG) child seats that are the subject of this investigation are equipped with a center front adjuster (CFA) and were manufactured in 2008 and 2009. The CFA functions as a locking mechanism that locks the shoulder harness in an adjusted position. After the harness of the child seat has been placed over the child's shoulders and buckled, it must be adjusted, or tightened, by pulling out on the tightening strap running through the CFA. The CFA is spring loaded to a normally closed position and the ?locking pawl (pawl) locks the harness tightening strap of the CFA in the adjusted position. The pawl permits movement of the strap in the tightening direction only. In order to release or loosen the harness adjustment, the pawl must be pressed down to open the CFA and unlock the adjusting strap. DJG's CFA is not used by other child seat manufacturers. The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation as PE10-009 on March 5, 2010 based on two reports from a consumer alleging the CFA would not securely lock the harness on two different model year DJG Vantage Point child seats. Based on information provided by DJG and additional consumer reports received by ODI on other model DJG child seats that use the CFA, the investigation was upgraded to EA10-005 on July 2, 2010. The scope of the investigation was expanded to include all DJG child seats manufactured in model years 2008 and 2009 equipped with the CFA. The consumer reports associated with the investigation allege the occupant harness slips while in use and becomes loose. A loose harness increases the risk of injury in a crash. There were no reports of CFA failure in a crash. On February 10, 2011, DJG submitted a Defect and Noncompliance Information Report to conduct a safety recall (11C-001) of certain subject child seats to remedy a condition where the pawl does not fully engage the harness tightening strap in the CFA. The recall affects approximately 795,000 seats manufactured from May 1, 2008 through April 30, 2009 and includes the following models:Prospect, OnBoard, Alpha Omega Elite, Alpha Omega, Mico, Enspira, Priori, Vantage Point, Avenue and Uptown. Seats of these models that were manufactured prior to May 1, 2008 and after April 30, 2009 are not included in the recall because the CFA was produced using a different process. ODI continued its investigation (EA10-005) as there were other models with a CFA manufactured from May 1, 2008 through April 30, 2009 that were not included in the recall scope. These models include the Summit, Scenera, Hi Back Booster, Designer 22, Apex, and Touriva. As part of this investigation, NHTSA's Vehicle Research and Test Center (VRTC) conducted extensive evaluation and testing, including FMVSS 213 sled tests, on both recalled and non-recalled models. The investigation did not reveal the existence of a safety-related defect trend in the CFA in the models that were not recalled. A safety-related defect trend in the non-recalled models has not been identified and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted. Accordingly, this investigation is closed. The closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist. The agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances. The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed online at www-odi.nhtsa.dot/complaints under the following identification numbers: 10291755, 10341694, 10322923, 10362638, 10313028, 1026596, 10290085, 10317274, and 10346913. Additional information is provided on the following pages.
A Engineering Analysis is the deeper stage, usually upgraded from a Preliminary Evaluation: NHTSA tests, requests engineering documents and decides whether a safety defect exists. The summary is the agency’s own text from its investigation file, unedited; the opening and closing resumes with the full reasoning are on NHTSA’s site under this number.
What this means for an owner
Source: and what happens nextAn investigation is not a finding that a defect exists, and it puts no duty on anyone. NHTSA opens a Preliminary Evaluation when complaints and other reports suggest a condition worth asking the manufacturer about; it upgrades to an Engineering Analysis when the answers warrant testing; it closes either when it recommends a recall, when the manufacturer recalls on its own, or when no defect trend is found. The agency’s own goals are about four months for a petition, eight for a Preliminary Evaluation or a Recall Query and eighteen for an Engineering Analysis; many run longer.
This one became a recall. The campaign page carries the manufacturer’s filed defect, risk and remedy, the build window and every model year covered; whether one specific vehicle is included is settled by VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
Model years it names
Source: as NHTSA filed themAlso named: 2009 Cosco 22123 (scenera); 2008 Cosco 22145 (scenera); 2008 DJG 22077; 2009 DJG 22078; 2008 DJG 22148; 2009 DJG 22148; 2008 DJG 22149; 2009 DJG 22149; 2008 DJG 22150; 2008 DJG 22152; 2009 DJG 22152; 2008 DJG 22154; 2009 DJG 22154; 2008 DJG 22155; 2009 DJG 22155; 2008 DJG 22158; 2009 DJG 22158; 2008 DJG 22159; 2009 DJG 22159; 2008 DJG 22172; 2009 DJG 22172; 2008 DJG 22177; 2009 DJG 22177; 2008 DJG 22178; 2009 DJG 22178; 2008 DJG 22185; 2008 DJG 22188; 2008 DJG 22195; 2009 DJG 22195; 2009 DJG 22346; 2009 DJG 22356; 2008 DJG 22371; 2009 DJG 22371; 2008 DJG 22372; 2008 DJG 22412; 2009 DJG 22412; 2008 DJG 22439; 2009 DJG 22439; 2008 DJG 22449; 2009 DJG 22449; 2009 DJG 22452; 2008 DJG 22453; 2009 DJG 22453; 2008 DJG 22456; 2009 DJG 22456; 2008 DJG 22458; 2009 DJG 22458; 2008 DJG 22459; 2009 DJG 22459; 2008 DJG 22462; 2009 DJG 22462; 2008 DJG 22465; 2009 DJG 22465; 2008 DJG 22469; 2009 DJG 22469; 2008 DJG 22475; 2009 DJG 22475; 2008 DJG 22476; 2009 DJG 22476; 2008 DJG 22486 and 117 more.
A vehicle page’s investigation list carries the same action; a name here is the scope NHTSA opened, not a list of affected VINs.
Common questions
Source: NHTSA Office of Defects InvestigationIs EA10005 a recall?
No — it is the investigation that led to one. Recall 11C001000 is the campaign; its page carries the remedy.
Is EA10005 still open?
No. It closed on Jun 25, 2012 and led to recall 11C001000.
Which vehicles does EA10005 cover?
NHTSA opened it on 177 model years: 2009 Cosco 22123 (scenera), 2008 Cosco 22145 (scenera), 2008 DJG 22077, 2009 DJG 22078, 2008 DJG 22148, 2009 DJG 22148 and more. That is the scope of the inquiry, not a list of affected vehicles; a recall, if one follows, defines its own population by VIN.